Congressional Democrats on Thursday demanded emergency hearings in the US House of Representatives to investigate President Donald Trump’s ouster of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, calling the move an effort to undermine a federal probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 US election.
Trump forced the resignation of Sessions on Wednesday, a day after elections in which his fellow Republicans lost control of the House but increased their majority in the Senate.
In a letter bit.ly/2DaU1nl saying the move placed the country "in the throes of a constitutional crisis," House Judiciary Committee Democrats demanded action from the panels Republican chairman, Bob Goodlatte, and called for bipartisan legislation to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller from any effort to stymie the probe.
A spokeswoman for Goodlatte had no comment on the letter.
Congressional Democrats, including newly elected members of the House, held a conference call on Thursday to discuss Sessions ouster, Democratic lawmakers and aides said.
Mueller is investigating Russias alleged interference in the 2016 election and any collusion by Trumps campaign. Trump, who denies any collusion, has long complained about the probe, calling it a witch hunt. He had frequently publicly castigated Sessions for recusing himself last year from the case.
During the Thursday conference call, House Democrats said they would attempt to include legislation protecting Muellers investigation in an appropriations bill that Congress is due to consider later this year.
Sessions ouster “just makes us all the more want to make sure we have that special counsel protection bill passed or added to any spending bill that may be moving in the (end-of-year) session,” said Representative Mark Pocan.
“We are watching what appears to be continued obstruction by this White House,” Pocan said in a telephone interview.
He said Democrats were concerned about what the Trump administration might do next concerning the special counsel probe: “Anyone writing even a dime-store novel knows what the next couple of steps are on this.”
Asked to comment on the Democrats call for a special counsel protection bill, a spokeswoman for the office of House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican, referred to past remarks by Ryan. He has said he does not believe there is a need for Congress to pass legislation aimed at protecting the special counsel from termination.
Trump named Sessions chief of staff, Matthew Whitaker, as acting attorney general, saying he would soon nominate a permanent replacement for review by the Senate.
That drew criticism from Democrats because Whitaker, who would now take over responsibility for overseeing Mueller and his investigation, has been critical of the Mueller probe, saying it should be scaled back.
Separately, House Judiciary Democrats called on Whitaker in a letter bit.ly/2PPqJ4q to recuse himself and keep the Mueller investigation under the supervision of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a career Justice Department official who has given the special counsel full scope to pursue leads. Rosenstein had the role of supervising the probe because of Sessions recusal.
The Democrats said they also want the Justice Department to protect the integrity of Muellers investigation and to preserve relevant documents.
“The forced firing of Attorney General Sessions appears to be part of an ongoing pattern of behaviour by the president seeking to undermine (the) investigation into Russian interference,” said the letter to Goodlatte, written by Representative Jerrold Nadler, the committees top Democrat, and 16 other Democrats who sit on the panel.
Recusal debate follows Trumps acting AG pick
Nadler is expected to become House Judiciary chairman when a Democratic House majority, elected in Tuesdays midterm elections, takes over in the new Congress that convenes in January.
“The presidents actions have plunged the country into peril,” the Democrats added. “By forcing the firing (of) the attorney general, the president now threatens the rule of law itself.”
Bipartisan bills to protect Mueller from politically motivated removal have been introduced in the House and Senate. One was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in April, making it eligible for a full Senate vote. But no action is expected.